← Evidence ledger
GEN Evidence

Buyer proof brief

Is there enough scoped, auditable evidence to design a permissioned Trust & Safety pilot?

Fictional demo. All values and reviews are invented; this is not a GEN result or authorized communication.

2026 Q3 · 2 reviewed claims · SYN-2026-Q3-8c2a44a2deac · frozen 2026-10-02

Claims for this decision

CLM-TIME-01

Paired triage time

18 min median reduction

In 4 fictional paired tasks, median triage time fell by 18 minutes.

Denominator

4 paired tasks

Uncertainty

4 paired tasks; no generalizable interval is claimed.

Method

Median of each task’s before-minus-after minutes; the same task is paired across conditions.

Claim boundary

Descriptive for 4 fictional tasks; no cross-agency or causal claim.

Source versions: SYN-STUDY-01 v1 · Review: synthetic-evaluation-reviewer, 2026-10-02

CLM-AUDIT-01

Evidence trail completeness

5 / 6 cases

5 of 6 fictional reviewed cases had a complete source, decision, reviewer and timestamp trail.

Denominator

6 reviewed synthetic cases

Uncertainty

The interval describes this small evaluation sample, not field performance.

Method

Complete reviewed cases divided by all distinct reviewed cases; incomplete cases remain in the denominator.

Claim boundary

A sample audit trail is not a GEN deployment-quality claim.

Source versions: SYN-EVAL-01 v1 · Review: synthetic-evaluation-reviewer, 2026-10-02

What the next pilot must establish

Agree on one buyer task, a representative adjudicated test set, baseline timing, error costs and permission to publish. The ten-example fictional benchmark in the reviewer queue is held because its uncertainty and deployment fit do not support a buyer quality claim.

Source to claim. Claim to decision.SYN-2026-Q3-8c2a44a2deac · synthetic